Table of contents

In many organizations, Active takes root in software development teams aiming to evangelize more value to the customer, faster. While this is a great starting time, meaningful organizational change comes from scaling Agile: enabling teams across the enterprise to use Agile frameworks and techniques to transform the way work gets done and ameliorate the products or services delivered to stop users.

Agile Program Direction: Brand Work Connected and Visible

Acquire the challenges facing organizations undergoing transformation and how enterprise Kanban software can aid yous finer do Agile Plan Management.

View the eBook • Agile Plan Management

Scaling Agile requires extending Agile principles beyond software development and IT to the rest of the business, both horizontally and vertically.
Scaling Active requires extending Active principles beyond software development and It to the balance of the business, both horizontally and vertically.

Scaling Active delivers significant and measurable benefits.

70-five percent of organizations with high agility report a minimum of 5% year-over-year revenue growth, compared with only 29% of organizations with low agility.

Further, research indicates that Agile transformation can reduce time to market by at least 40%. Scaling Agile isn't merely about creating more efficient teams; information technology's about differentiating the business organisation.

Scaling Active requires extending Agile principles beyond software development and It to the rest of the business, both horizontally and vertically. Scaling Agile can bring about tremendous benefits at every level of the arrangement, just it besides introduces more challenges than the relatively straightforward procedure of implementing Active in a unmarried team.

Let'southward look at what scaling Agile requires, common challenges faced by companies scaling Agile, how to overcome those challenges, and the benefits of doing so successfully.

What does "scaling Agile" mean?

Scaling Agile refers to the process of translating established Agile methods, similar Scrum and Kanban, to larger groups of people. Traditional Active teams, according to the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe), work best with groups of v to 11 members.

Equally companies see success in these modest groups, they often want to replicate it at a larger team, department, or organizational level. That's where scaling Agile comes in.

Scaling Agile is not as elementary as applying traditional Agile principles to a larger group of people. The Software Engineering science Institute at Carnegie Mellon University identified eight attributes that should exist considered when scaling Active as organizations create programs that implement Agile processes:

  1. Team size
  2. Specialization of roles
  3. Iteration length
  4. Synchronized cadence
  5. Release definition
  6. Batch size
  7. Product owner role
  8. User role

Each of these components plays a role in scaling Agile successfully, but getting it "correct" is a complex task. For that reason, many enterprises utilise a scaling Agile framework to guide their efforts.

What are scaling Agile frameworks and how do they compare?

Scaling Agile frameworks are established methodologies designed to address the challenges of implementing Agile at scale. They provide organizations with a roadmap to scaling Agile in an efficient and constructive way.

Several frameworks be to help organizations with scaling Agile, including:

Scaled Agile Framework® (SAFe®): The Scaled Agile Framework describes itself equally a "noesis base of proven, integrated principles, practices, and competencies for achieving concern agility using Lean, Agile, and DevOps." SAFe is a well-established arroyo to scaling Agile that includes planning at the team, program, and portfolio level.

The framework introduced the thought of the Agile Release Train (Fine art) to structure piece of work across teams of 50-125 people, as well every bit the Release Train Engineer (RTE) equally the role at its helm. SAFe requires consistent two- and x-week iterations, which can piece of work well for organizations with a more established Agile practice but can prove ambitious for companies new to the practice.

Disciplined Agile (DA): Disciplined Agile is "a tool kit that harnesses hundreds of Active practices to guide y'all to the best way of working for your team or organization." DA is less prescriptive than Rubber and oriented more every bit a foundational arroyo to Active than a strict "recipe" for scaling Agile. It emphasizes team roles and a goal-driven arroyo that makes it more flexible than other scaling Agile frameworks.

Big-Scale Scrum (LeSS): As its proper noun implies, LeSS tackles the challenge of scaling Agile through the specific lens of the Scrum, helping organizations figure out "how to apply the principles, purpose, elements, and elegance of Scrum in a large-scale context, as simply every bit possible."

LeSS uses teams as its foundational building blocks, reduces the office of direction, and advocates for simplicity versus strictly divers processes. LeSS is recognized as an impactful approach for organizations that already use scrum practices and want to scale Agile in a way that is both streamlined and robust.

[e-mail protected]: Created by Dr. Jeff Sutherland, the co-creator of Scrum and the Scrum Guide, this "lightweight, adaptable scaling framework is known for 'minimum feasible bureaucracy' via a scale-free architecture and empowering every Scrum squad member." Scrum at Scale follows core concepts including teams of five people, a focus on linear scalability, and an emphasis on reducing the time it takes to brand decisions inside an arrangement. Scrum at Calibration combines two cycles, the Scrum Chief Cycle and the Product Possessor Bicycle, to coordinate the efforts of multiple teams beyond the organization.

When information technology comes to scaling Agile, none of these approaches or their alternatives are correct or wrong; the all-time framework depends on the needs, background, and personality of the teams and the business. Each framework approaches scaling Agile in a unlike way, but they all acknowledge that it is a challenging process with speed bumps that every system must overcome.

How to Overcome Three Common Challenges When Scaling Agile

Inspiring and implementing change in a pocket-size team is one thing; transforming how an entire organization thinks and how executes work is quite another. Fifty-fifty the virtually sophisticated Agile software development teams and frontwards-thinking enterprises face roadblocks when they choose to calibration Agile.

Scaling Agile challenges typically fall into three categories: civilization, work management, and engineering science.

Scaling Active challenge #1: Civilisation shift

Agile is often described as a culture or shared mindset instead of a set of practices. In the context of scaling Active, this is both a approval and a curse. The framework used to scale Agile is less important than the shared mindset behind it, simply that shared mindset tin be difficult to create. Agile adept and author Steve Denning explains:

The elements of a culture fit together as a mutually reinforcing system and combine to prevent any attempt to change it. Single-ready changes at the team level may appear to make progress for a while, but eventually the interlocking elements of the organizational culture take over and the modify is inexorably drawn back into the existing organizational culture.

Denning'southward prediction may be dire, but information technology's also accurate. Failure to shift company civilisation is one of the main causes of Active transformation failure.

Scaling Agile demands that unabridged organizations recollect, act, and respond differently in every dimension, from how work is planned, managed, and completed to employee date. That shift requires time and intention, but well-nigh importantly, it requires commitment from the acme.

Scaling Agile successfully starts with company leadership.

Leaders must truly understand the Lean-Agile mindset. This includes prioritizing value, flow, and continuous improvement over milestones and requirements, as well as embracing the ideas of declining fast and learning from ongoing change.

Agile leaders must be prepare to challenge the status quo and adapt their management styles. A Lean-Agile mindset fosters servant leadership, in which leaders set the strategic objectives and team chapters, then trust their teams to come across those objectives in the way that works best for them. In this way, leaders support the fundamental Agile principles of accountability and autonomy — central elements of scaling Agile.

Scaling Agile claiming #2: Work management shift

The civilization shift required to calibration Agile aligns the organization to the principles that people want to practice their best work and maximize customer value. To turn those principles into reality, businesses demand to shift their work management methods to enable value to menstruation.

Traditional work and projection management approaches outset with a fixed scope and approximate the time and resources (people) necessary to achieve that scope. This thought assumes that by defining requirements up forepart, organizations tin reduce risk and increase success.

The Lean-Agile model, on the other manus, flips that paradigm. Time and resources go more stock-still through established iteration windows and teams of people while scope becomes more fluid, influenced by abiding learning and change. Teams experiment and receive feedback quickly and adapt the scope accordingly so that organizations can suit in a nimble manner.

When scaling Active, organization tin can shift their piece of work management approach by:

  • Evolving management mode from a control-and-control approach to a more open style of leadership, as discussed above
  • Adjusting budgeting practices from existence project-driven to being adamant by value stream
  • Modifying team structures to enable rapid experimentation and agile collaboration
  • Irresolute communication styles from top-down to more horizontal
  • Adapting the role of the PMO from the strength that dictates how work gets done to the connecting fabric that promotes knowledge across the enterprise

Scaling Agile challenge #3: Engineering science shift

Finally, organizations working towards scaling Agile must accost their technology stack. Scaling Active across the enterprise both requires and creates increased visibility, transparency, and information menstruum. For most organizations, that means evaluating and potentially augmenting or replacing engineering solutions.

Technology "silos" are the enemy of scaling Agile.

If financials, capacity planning, and corporate objectives are in i tool, but commitment of work is tracked in a completely different tool (or tools), commitment teams are already asunder from strategic goals. Technology tools need to back up alignment at a tactical level. Even if the civilisation and workflows are in place, teams tin can't scale Active successfully without the right solutions to underpin their work.

What technology tools can facilitate scaling Active? Information technology depends, in role, on the organization's Agile maturity.

If the business organization already supports multiple Agile teams, scaling Active may mean implementing a solution that can connect them for improved transparency and menstruation. Other organizations may demand something more robust that can go beyond teams' and teams of teams' visibility to map Active work to the greater portfolio. Look for a tool that allows information and collaboration to flow in both directions, mapping strategic plans down to Agile teams and rolling work, impact, and financial contributions up to strategic objectives.

Information technology'due south critical that the solution can abound with the organization as well. What's correct at present may not be what is needed in a year or 2, and asking teams to completely change their workflows every bit they mature is often request too much.

Top 5 Benefits of Scaling Agile

While scaling Active does involve cultural, management, and technology shifts, the benefits far outweigh the challenges. Scaling Agile beyond the enterprise brings about endless business advantages, both tangible and intangible. From faster time to market to higher customer satisfaction, better ROI to alluring top talent, scaling Agile tin truly transform the enterprise.

one. Marshal strategy and work.

Scaling Agile connects the business's top-level objectives with the people who are responsible for achieving them. This crystal-articulate alignment creates numerous downstream effects, including fostering transparency, boosting cross-squad coordination, enabling faster response times, and increasing agility if priorities change or the market shifts.

Farther, scaling Active emphasizes creating Active Release Trains (ARTs) or teams of teams. This ensures that not simply are teams aligned to objectives, only everyone in the organization is centered on producing value for customers.

2. Improve capacity direction.

With a scaled Agile approach, chapters direction (balancing availability and workload) is aligned to ARTs or teams of teams and reevaluated regularly, often every quarter. This method keeps the focus on creating value while allowing for flexibility and alter, empowering leadership to reflect and rebalance on a regular cadence with minimal disruption to organizational flow. Management benefits from persistent, stable teams with historical metrics around delivery, so they tin make informed decisions about who can accept on how much and what kind of piece of work.

3. Facilitate teams of teams planning.

Scaling Agile across the enterprise involves bringing people from multiple functions and departments together under the aforementioned umbrella. This may occur across the whole business in an end-to-terminate value chain or inside departments, like Dev and Ops, simply always requires the need for greater alignment and coordination.

Scaling Agile frameworks solve for this through prescribed quarterly planning events that bring cantankerous-functional teams together to build plans that deliver against corporate goals, highlight potential dependencies, and identify risks. These "teams of teams" planning events play a key office in scaling Agile by giving everyone in the organization articulate visibility into quarterly deliverables.

four. Enable enterprise-wide visibility.

Visibility doesn't just come from planning events. Scaling Agile enables enterprise-wide transparency by connecting and visualizing work from every team.

Equally a result, leaders and managers proceeds a big-motion-picture show view into potential bottlenecks and tin can brand informed choices to allocate work appropriately. Scaling Agile offers the ability to clearly and consistently meet how ARTs or teams of teams are delivering, mensurate their progress, and gauge the fiscal bear upon of their work.

5. Engage employees.

Scaling Agile is deeply rooted in trust and autonomy at the team and individual level. People are empowered to make decisions about how their piece of work is delivered and informed almost how their piece of work impacts the highest-level business goals. This trust and autonomy translate straight to happier and more engaged employees, who in turn benefit the business with lower turnover rates, greater productivity, and higher satisfaction.

Bring the Benefits of Agile Across the Enterprise

Scaling Agile doesn't just extend Active from software development to the rest of the business; it expands its impact as well. United under a common framework, companies can enact meaningful change at every level: individuals are more engaged, teams are more productive, and organizations meet real, top- and bottom-line impact. Scaling Active does have its challenges, simply with the correct framework, arroyo, and technology, the benefits can be transformational.